Soul Hander (1:40:48 PM): Have a fun fact: Instrumental versions of rap songs are posted on youtube
peabnut bubber (1:41:01 PM): ... Interesting.
Soul Hander (1:41:03 PM): And in the comments section, people leave lyrics they've written themselves to be read along to the beat
Soul Hander (1:41:24 PM): Not only that, but some of it is pretty smooth
Soul Hander (1:41:36 PM): And of course, some of it is sh*t.
peabnut bubber (1:41:58 PM): Is it better to be smooth or sh*t?
peabnut bubber (1:42:11 PM): I'm not down with all your lingo.
Soul Hander (1:42:36 PM): Sh*t isn't usually good unless there's an adjective of sorts behind it.
Soul Hander (1:42:43 PM): Smooth is good, and sh*t is bad.
Soul Hander (1:42:59 PM): But if it's
smooth sh*t, then sh*t is used for emphasis, and it becomes
very good.
Soul Hander (1:43:35 PM): Derogatory adjectives however, such as
whack, convert the sh*t to a negative realm.
peabnut bubber (1:44:11 PM): I see. How does it conjugate?
Soul Hander (1:44:20 PM): I'm sorry?
peabnut bubber (1:44:55 PM): Such as comparatives and superlatives. Would it be more sh*tty or sh*ttier?
Soul Hander (1:45:09 PM): Give me an example.
peabnut bubber (1:45:51 PM): Well, suppose I found this piece of Silver fanart:
http://bluc.deviantart.com/art/Butterfl ... -158653062peabnut bubber (1:46:03 PM): And I said to myself, "This is quite sh*t."
Soul Hander (1:46:08 PM): Hmmm...
peabnut bubber (1:46:16 PM): But then, I found, against all reason, something more of that quality.
Soul Hander (1:46:33 PM): A quality of sh*t.
peabnut bubber (1:46:40 PM): Further.
peabnut bubber (1:46:42 PM): Moreso.
peabnut bubber (1:46:45 PM): Inexplicably.
Soul Hander (1:47:13 PM): Then the original nature of sh*t is merely furthered, with no change other than
intensity of the sh*t.
peabnut bubber (1:47:38 PM): Fascinating.
Soul Hander (1:48:41 PM): That was pretty classy.
Soul Hander (1:48:52 PM): Classy as
sh*t.peabnut bubber (1:50:36 PM): Agreed.